Did Hollywood aid Hitler?

September 27, 2013
By

urwand-collaboration-hitler-290The New Yorker’s David Denby has followed up his negative review of Ben Urwand’s new book, The Collaboration: Hollywood’s Pact with Hitler–which claims that major Hollywood studies actively collaborated with Nazi Germany–with a detailed blog post pointing out additional errors and omissions:

Urwand leaves the impression, despite some perfunctory nods to the Hollywood Anti-Nazi League and other liberal anti-Nazi activity in the movie colony, that the American cinema of the thirties was rife with fascist filmmakers. … Urwand is so busy hunting for Nazi messages that he doesn’t mention the Marx Brothers, whose “Duck Soup” was a burlesque of dictatorial regimes, or the gangster movies, which were loved for their anti-establishment message. He mentions Frank Capra’s movies, with their frequent hatred of the rich and powerful, but does so without suggesting how central they were to the era. He doesn’t mention the many newspaper comedies (“The Front Page” was the most famous), in which wise-guy journalists tell off stuffed shirts and corrupt political leaders. As Pauline Kael remarked, the reason why you don’t see journalists doing that in movies from other countries is not because those countries lacked stuffed shirts and corrupt officials. Urwand doesn’t mention “Fury” and “Black Legion,” with their loathing of mob violence, either. Urwand misses all of that—the happy freedom, the sexual entanglements of rich and poor, the anti-authoritarian tone of so much American entertainment in the thirties. If the studios were working for the Nazis, they certainly found a strange way of doing it.

Read the original review here, and the blog post here.

Share

3 Responses to “ Did Hollywood aid Hitler? ”

  1. Ray Hoff on September 27, 2013 at 9:42 am

    Thank you, Sebastiaan…. we tend to look for Nazis under every bed. I am sure Mike Godwin would enjoy commenting on this book and I will ask him to.

    My first reaction was “What about the Great Dictator” with Chaplin, but then that was 1940. “Modern Times” was certainly no right wing movie and that was 1936.

    There is an interesting article pointing out Malcolm Birdwell’s 1999 book “Celluloid Soldiers: Warner Bros.’s Campaign against Nazism” (see http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ajh/summary/v089/89.3herman.html ).

    Hollywood needed to worry more about oppressing movies in the 1940′s and 1950′s.

  2. Ray Hoff on September 27, 2013 at 9:45 am

    That said… Denby makes me want to read the book.

  3. Sonia García López on October 25, 2013 at 5:26 am

    I look forward to read the book too. I am following this fascinating polemic (which, by the way, has reached spanish newspapers), and I am intrigued to know how Urwand contextualizes or historicizes his thesis about the studios’ support to Hitler. Just to add some elements to the debate, according to Sabine Hake (Screen Nazis. Cinema History, and Democracy, 2012, p. 32), “between 1939 and 1946 Hollywood studios made approximately 180 feature-lenght films known as anti-Nazi films”. ‘Confessions of a Nazi spy’ (Anatole Litvak, Warner Bros., 1939), the very first anti-Nazi film, or Fritz Lang’s ‘Man Hunt’ (Twentieth Century Fox, 1941), ‘Hangmen Also Die!’ (Arnold Pressburger Films, 1943), to which Bertolt Brech contributed as a scriptwriter, and ‘Ministry of Fear’ (Paramount Pictures, 1944) could be mentioned, among others, as serious approaches to the question.

Leave a Comment